Die Stele der Taimhotep
Lingua Aegyptia. 2010. Vol. 18. S. 169–191.
This new study of the well-known funerary stela from the late Ptolemaic Period aims at clarifying the reading of a number of troublesome lines and argues their eventual interpretations. Comparative analysis of the earlier editions has provided a ground for revealing inaccuracies occurred in the text. The paper contains a hieroglyphic transcription based on a thorough examination of the original by its photo, transliteration and translation accompanied by philological notes; as a supplementary a list of dictionary slips with the entire text copied by K. Sethe for the Wb (from the Digital Slip Archive) is given.
...
For dating of an architrave of the New Kingdom
Göttinger Miszellen. 2010. Hft. 224. S. 111.
A brief note provoked by the publication of the catalogue of objects found during the excavation work Matariya in 2001- 2003 (GM 218 (2008): 49-56). Basing on the restoration of the royal titulary and epithets the author disputes the dating of an architrave (GM 218 (2008): 50) to the reign of Amenhotep IV.
...
Two programs
Göttinger Miszellen. 2009. Hft. 222. S. 105–109.
The paper presents a description of egyptological software designed by E. Baluk and M. Panov. The first one, Corpus, is aimed to be a useful tool for systematization of all kind of data of linguistic research. The second, Hieroglyphica, is an editor for creating hieroglyphic inscriptions. The reader will find the information on main features of these programmes.
...
Ptahhotep’s editions: new observations
Göttinger Miszellen. 2008. Hft. 218. S. 107–110.
Additional notes to the previous article containing a list of errors (about twenty cases) occurred in the editions of pBM 10509 (L2). The verification is based on the facsimile of the source.
...
Рецензия на: Adrom F. Die Lehre des Amenemhet. Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca XIX. Brepols Publishers n.v. Turnhout. Belgium, 2006. 99 P. ISBN 978–2–503–52100–8
Göttinger Miszellen. 2008. Hft. 219. S. 104–106.
Zur Bedeutung eines Titels in der Nestesen-Stele
Lingua Aegyptia. 2008. Bd. 16. S. 95–104.
The paper discusses several variants for the reading of the royal epithet in lines 2-3 of the stela of Nestesen (stBerlin 2268).
...
Some remarks on editors’ errors in Ptahhotep and other texts
Göttinger Miszellen. 2007. Hft. 217. S. 39–57.
The work is a result of a thorough study of all known editions of “The Maxims of Ptahhotep”. The author establishes the classification of the errors made by the editors of the hieroglyphic text and supplies every type of mistakes with numerous examples from the publications of different literary records. According to the proposed classification a group of common inaccuracies includes an absence of rubrication, an omission of signs, incorrect transliteration etc. Thus, more than 80 cases of discrepancy are revealed. Besides, a general description of all publications of the sources with the text of the Instruction is given.
...